lt/100km

Chat about anything and everything.
User avatar
ToranaGuy
Posts: 1589
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:38 am
Location: In the Shed!
Contact:

I was getting about 8L/100 with a heavy right boot and a worn out F8b & F5a 4spd before it died. It will be interesting to see how much better the new F8b is in fuel economy or performance for the same fuel. :lol:

It's heaps better than the average of my EB @ 15.5/100 of late, but i give it a hard time. Cruising on the Hwy i can get it down to 8/100 with the cruise on & in 5th gear. :D

Cheers

ToranaGuy
It's update time MB Parts list! send part info to toranaguy74@optusnet.com.au|
User avatar
Brayden
Posts: 9101
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 3:09 am
Location: Canberra ACT
Contact:

Using L/100kms is fine by me for the purpose of comparing fuel economy as it makes the comparisons far more simple.
F8B EFI turbo - Three pots and a snail.
Unco
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:45 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

mowog wrote:mine was getting about 55-60 mpg but I had a big lunch.
l per 100k is a load of crap that was inflicted on us by the metric conversion people who also gave us m/2 instead of 2/m so that I always have to verify what I am actually being offerred as square metres is not the same as metres squared.
apparently these peolpe were geeks kept in a white room and never let out into the real world. When Labor was last in power I think.
I totally ignore litres per 100 k, and ask the sales rep what the kilometres per litre is, always makes them think.
the fact is that it is a pain to work out how much fuel you need or use in the l/k method. I need to know that if i put in 18 litres I am going to travel approximately 150k.
Apparently when the metric measurements were introduced motoring journalists were threatened with legal action by the govt if they used km per l, as most wanted.
i am yet to come across one person who understands litres/100km. i understand it, but i don't think many more people do.

when i tell them that i was getting 20L/100Km in the F100 and 25L/100Km in my LTD (which i have since sold), they thought the LTD had better fuel economy and when you try to explain it to them, their eyes glaze.

i don't have a problem with either way of showing fuel efficiency, but i must admit, Km per Litres makes a hell of a lot more sense and should be easier to understand.
User avatar
Billie
Posts: 2692
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:18 pm
Location: Brisbane

its not very hard to understand
Unco
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:45 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

nova_66 wrote:its not very hard to understand
you're a minority. and what are your figures, btw?

have you tried to explain it to the general public?
User avatar
Brayden
Posts: 9101
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 3:09 am
Location: Canberra ACT
Contact:

Everyone I speak to about cars (admittedly most are <30) all use L/100kms. Most new cars these days have L/100kms as an onboard economy measurement.

Yes it is a rubbish measurement for working out how far you can get on a tank of fuel, but when comparing the economy of two cars it makes the job far simpler.

Personally I find trying to compare economy figures using km/L is more difficult, kind of like trying to compare acceleration by using distance travelled in a fixed time value, rather than time taken to go 0-100kph.
F8B EFI turbo - Three pots and a snail.
User avatar
Tez
Posts: 1176
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:38 pm
Location: Croydon, Vic

trying to compare economy figures using km/L is more difficult
Sorry Brayden, but I'll have to take you to task on this...
Whilst I don't have any particular problem with L/100k I still think Kms/L is simpler... - It is no different really to Mi/Gal. which was the old measurement.
Car A goes 16.2k's / litre
Car B goes 22.7k's / litre
Car C goes 12.9k's / litre

Which one is more fuel efficient? :-o
Tez
So the adventure continues...
User avatar
Brokenshire
Posts: 695
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:40 pm
Location: Nelson Bay
Contact:

Car A 6.17L/100km
Car B 4.41L/100km
Car C 7.75L/100km

Is the same car still as efficent?
User avatar
Billie
Posts: 2692
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:18 pm
Location: Brisbane

if i could get my mb to run long enough to get figures i would be really happy
Karu
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 1:31 am
Location: Melbourne

I know that if I am, say, 40 kilometres from home and I am running on empty with a little money in my pocket I can put just over 2 litres in my tank and be safe. Using litres per 100 km I am stuffed for an equation.
User avatar
suzutey
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 10:25 pm
Location: Melbourne

my f8b is 8 or 9 lt/100k

but its screwed.
User avatar
ToranaGuy
Posts: 1589
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:38 am
Location: In the Shed!
Contact:

suzutey wrote:my f8b is 8 or 9 lt/100k

but its screwed.
That's petrol, how's about oil L/100kms? lol. Mine was using 2.5/100 of oil until i removed it from service. :x

Cheers

ToranaGuy
It's update time MB Parts list! send part info to toranaguy74@optusnet.com.au|
User avatar
Tez
Posts: 1176
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:38 pm
Location: Croydon, Vic

Mine was using 2.5/100 of oil until i removed it from service
ROTFL

Thats a fair effort Jay given, the capacity of the oil system is only 2.5L :lol:
Tez
So the adventure continues...
Karu
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 1:31 am
Location: Melbourne

705 km trip F10A Super Carry with 265,000 original km with speeds up to 125 = 100ml oil.
User avatar
cam
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:08 pm
Location: Darwin, Northern Territory

My F8b running turbo carby and no turbo gets 10L/100 but over fuels on anything more than half throttle! cant wait to get the turbo back on as soon as uni exams are over!
Post Reply